customertrio.blogg.se

1. PCI SIMPLE COMMUNICATIONS CONTROLLER HP 8710W DRIVERS
2. PCI SIMPLE COMMUNICATIONS CONTROLLER HP 8710W DRIVER

Stop letting these folks dictate to us what systems we can and can't have.

PCI SIMPLE COMMUNICATIONS CONTROLLER HP 8710W DRIVERS

Point being, we are all screwed until the interface manufacturers quit blaming the chipsets and start fixing the damn drivers to accomodate what the system manufacturers are using. Even then, it's a crap-shoot if they include them in their latest models. In fact, Apple and HP are the only two I can identify today that are selling modern systems with the TI chipsets. Here's the kicker, there are VERY few laptop manufacturers that are producing systems with TI chipsets anymore.

PCI SIMPLE COMMUNICATIONS CONTROLLER HP 8710W DRIVER

The driver needs to be written to accomodate this and there is apparently no standards between these chipset manufacturers.

Granted, the TI and VIA sets may be superior, I don't honestly know that for a fact, but the REAL cause of the problem is that different chipsets communicate with your system internals in different ways. If a kernel debugger is available get the stack backtrace.Īrg1: 0000000000000008, memory referencedīit 0 : value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operationīit 3 : value 0 = not an execute operation, 1 = execute operation (only on chips which support this level of status)Īrg4: fffff80002a077f7, address which referenced memoryįor those that don't speak computer mumbo-jumbo, this is essentially stating that the driver for the RME is overrunning memory and interrupts that it shouldn't be. This is usuallyĬaused by drivers using improper addresses. Interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is the debug analysis that anyone can pull with the right MS tools, from the Memory.dmp which is created when your system bites the big dirty one:Īn attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an XP did indeed have some issues that have since been corrected, and no, you didn't replace your chipsets did you? I previously owned a Dell E1705 that putted along just fine with the Ricoh chipset.imagine that! NOT TRUE! As most of you know that have a system with Ricoh or Agere chipsets, they work just fine in both Leopard and XP. Turns out, it's the freakin driver! RME and others seem to have everyone convinced that there's something wrong with the Ricoh and Agere chipsets and that TI or VIA is the only "acceptable" chipset for these devices. I've been rattling some cages over on the RME forum trying to get the root cause. Well, as you probably already guessed, the Fireface 800 is crashing my system. I bought an "Early 2009" iMac last summer that I recently upgraded to Windows 7 圆4. Thought I would make you all aware of this.